Showing posts with label Gray Market Goods. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gray Market Goods. Show all posts

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Importing Gray Market Goods – The Omega v. Costco Case

"Critical Implications of Costco v. Omega on the Gray Goods and the First Sale Doctrine" CLE Program is now available at lawline.com here

Lawline.com now has available a continuing legal education (CLE) course that I served as faculty on regarding a case that dealt with an importation of “gray market goods.” Specifically, it had to do with the Supreme Court’s December 2010 affirmance of the case heard in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals entitled, Omega S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 541 F.3d 962 (9th Cir. 2008). (For more information on gray market goods, see my Dec. 20, 2010 post)

To give a little background, Omega, a popular high end watch company, is the owner of a “Globe” watch design that is registered with the US Copyright Office. It also has its trademark registered with the US Patent and Trademark Office.

Omega had a production of watches manufactured overseas that bore the Omega trademark and the copyprighted Globe design.

Costco thereafter purchased the foreign manufactured Omega watches bearing the copyright and trademark, and imported them into the United States for sale in its US stores at a price of $1,299, which was significantly less than Omega's US retail sales price of $1,995.

Costco did so however, without the authorization of Omega, which according to Omega, was in violation of the Copyright Act’s prohibition on unauthorized importations.

In its defense, Costco raised what is known under Copyright law (and not Customs law) as the “First Sale Doctrine.” This doctrine places a limitation on the exclusive rights of a copyright owner (19 USC §109a) which in this case is Omega.

Ultimately, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals position was that using this defense was permissible only where the disputed copies of a copyrighted work were either made or previously sold in the US with the authority of the copyright owner. That is, Costco could not use it as a defense in this instance.

The Supreme Court agreed.

For an in-depth discussion on some possible implications of this decision on imports, check out our program on lawline.com by clicking here.

Questions/comments? Email me at clark.deanna@gmail.com or post below.

Monday, December 20, 2010

Protecting Intellectual Property: US Customs and Gray Market Goods

Preventing the importation of merchandise that infringes on the intellectual property rights of a United States trademark or copyright owner is one of US Customs’ mandates that it takes very seriously.

Determining who is authorized to import products that have on it the design, labeling, words, or other “work” that belongs to a non-importing party can be tricky. This is because, under most licensing agreements, a party (known as the “licensee”) is only given a limited right to use the “work” of another (known as the “licensor”) on its merchandise. Limitations may include use within a limited timeframe, or on certain types of products only.

Another limitation arises from distribution rights. These provide for the sale and/or distribution of a product within a certain geographical area.

Making a determination as to who has the authority to import articles upon which a protected “work” has been used can therefore become all the more complex when you add to these facts the following additional circumstances:

The lawful production of an article in one location which is then subsequently
(a) sold, and
(b) exported to another location outside of the limited licensed-for zone.


To give you an example in everyday language, this means that if I have permission to sell a good that has party “AA’s” logo on it in the European Union (EU) only, then in theory, I am precluded from selling it in another territory.

Okay, easy enough. But what if that product is lawfully sold within the EU and then that buying party decides to sell it for export to the United States?

Now we’re entering the “gray market” zone… (“doo-do-do-dooo, doo-do-do-dooo…” anyone out there remember the “Twilight Zone”© theme song?)

While preventing the importation of an outright counterfeit article (see the definition below) is a relatively easy concept to grasp, a lesser known concept, known as “gray market goods,” are another type of import that US Customs is on the look out for to intercept and prevent its importation.

A counterfeit trademark is a spurious mark that is identical with, or substantially indistinguishable from, a federally registered trademark. Merchandise imported into the United States bearing marks that are “counterfeit” of a federally registered trademark recorded with CBP shall be seized pursuant to section 526(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. §1526(e)), as implemented by 19 CFR § 133.21.

An easy way to think about the definition of a “gray market good” is to think of it as a “parallel good,” that is, it is

1) A genuine product (i.e., not a fake or counterfeit)
2) Lawfully made (typically overseas)
3) With the permission of the owner of the “work”
4) Which bears a copyright, trademark, or trade name, and
5) Is imported into the United States
6) Without the authorization of the United States trademark or copyright owner.

US Customs will protect gray market goods of only those copyrights, trademarks, and trade names that are recorded with its agency. This protective status commences from the time of recordation with US Customs of the “work.”

Where US Customs has conferred gray market protection, imported merchandise bearing the protected “work” will be detained and is subject to potential seizure, forfeiture, and of course, penalties, so you want to be sure to have all of your paper work in order to prove that you have been given permission to import products of this kind into the U.S. so that your shipments do not get held up at the border.

Questions/comments? Post below or email me at clark.deanna@gmail.com