As the watchdog of our country’s borders, US Customs has the authority to enforce, and otherwise maintain the integrity of, other federal agency regulations with respect to imported merchandise.While the
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is responsible for the oversight of some better known laws, including the
Flammable Fabrics Act (addressing
inter alia, sleepwear and mattresses) and the
Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) (dealing with,
inter alia, children’s products and lighters), it is likewise overseeing some lesser known laws which I find to be interesting, such as the
Refrigerator Safety Act and the
Children’s Gasoline Burn Prevention Act.
Like
US Customs, CPSC has specific statutory authority under 15 USC §2066 and 15 USC §1273 for sampling imports in order to ensure compliance with consumer product safety rules. Where a violation of its regulations is suspected, it likewise may issue a
notice of detention (if the circumstances so require) describing the alleged violation and its governing statute.
CPSC will issue this notice to the importer who then deals directly with CPSC. Copies are provided to the importer’s Customs broker and US Customs as well. Detained merchandise remains under US Customs custody whether US Customs has issued its own detention notice or not.
Typically, the recipient of a notice has 5 business days within which to provide the requested information to CPSC in order to resolve the detention. While extensions may be granted, CPSC makes an effort to resolve detentions within 30 days.
Of all of the laws that CPSC regulates, where a violation of the CPSA occurs (and only the CPSA), a hearing may be sought by the importer, owner, or consignee under the Administrative Procedures Act. During this time however, i.e., pending the completion of the hearing, the merchandise must remain under government custody at the expense of the importer, owner, or consignee, which in everyday language, typically amounts to fees for warehousing and other incidental charges, such as the use of a forklift, a forklift supervisor, etc. Charges will vary based on the quantity and type of merchandise at issue.
When requested, CPSC may grant a conditional release of the merchandise for examination and testing so long as it remains under the US Customs bond. While "conditionally released" the goods may not be distributed.
Of course, where the cargo is not returned prior to the termination of the conditional release period, there is always the risk that US Customs might issue a Redelivery Notice which could ultimately lead to seizure, destruction or exportation of the merchandise.
Or, in the event the goods are not redelivered, an importer would likely be facing an assessment of liquidated damages. US Customs must issue this notice however, within 30 days after the end of the conditional release period.
Lastly, an importer may request that the detained merchandise be exported or destroyed. Of course, destruction means that not only has the importer/owner forfeited the money for the cost of the merchandise, but it also has to pay out-of-pocket for its destruction, and carry out the operation under Government supervision.
Needless to say, when an alleged violation remains unresolved, big brother (i.e., some branch of the government) will be watching, until a resolution has been found, a penalty (or liquidated damages claim) has been paid, or the merchandise has been destroyed.
In my experience I have noticed that all too often, importers believe that “no news is good news.” As a practitioner, I recognize that no news can actually be a prelude to really bad news with expensive consequences.
It would therefore, be prudent to routinely review importation practices and protocols, and obtain periodic advice and counsel on existing practices to ensure compliance with existing laws or newly implemented regulations. As always with new endeavors, the prudent approach would be to obtain expert advice.
Questions/comments? Post below or email me at clark.deanna@gmail.com
