How Many Times Do I Have to Pay Duties?

The first time you import merchandise into the U.S., you would expect to pay customs duties, and under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the U.S. (HTSUS), unless the goods are exempted from such payment, that money will have to be paid.

But what about if the merchandise had

a. Already been imported,

b. Duties Paid,

c. Subsequently Exported, and

d. Now being reimported again?

 Is paying again required?

Well, depending on the circumstances, there can be ways of either recouping some of the initial duty payment, or qualifying for an exception to avoid paying the duty such as the exemption where articles exported from the U.S. are

1. Returned within 45 days of such exportation,

2. Were “undeliverable”, and

3. Which had not left the custody of the carrier or foreign customs service.

As a general rule however, 19 CFR 141.2 of the Customs regulations provides that dutiable merchandise imported and afterwards exported, even though the duty had been paid on the first importation, is liable for duty payment on every subsequent importation into the Customs territory of the US (unless exempt by law).

This rule does not however, apply to imports of:

(a) Personal and household effects taken abroad by a resident of the United States and brought back on his return to this country (see §148.31);

(b) Professional books, implements, instruments, and tools of trade, occupation, or employment taken abroad by an individual and brought back on his return to this country (see §148.53);

(c) Automobiles and other vehicles taken abroad for noncommercial use (see §148.32);

(d) Metal boxes, casks, barrels, carboys, bags, quicksilver flasks or bottles, metal drums, or other substantial outer containers exported from the United States empty and returned as usual containers or coverings of merchandise, or exported filled with products of the United States and returned empty or as the usual containers or coverings of merchandise (see §10.7(b), (c), (d), and (e));

(e) Articles exported from the United States for repairs or alterations, which may be returned upon the payment of duty on the value of repairs or alterations at the rate or rates which would otherwise apply to the articles in their repaired or altered conditions (see §10.8);

(f) Articles exported for exhibition under certain conditions (see §§10.66 and 10.67);

(g) Domestic animals taken abroad for temporary pasturage purposes and returned within 8 months (see §10.74);

(h) Articles exported under lease to a foreign manufacturer (see §10.108); or

(i) Any other reimported articles for which free entry is specifically provided.

Questions or comments?  Post below or email me at clark.deanna@gmail.com

Keep up with me at www.fashioncompliance.com or:

On Facebook at www.facebook.com/FashionCompliance

On Twitter @fashcompliance

Does Your New Pair of Shoes Have a Fuzzy Bottom? CBP’s New ISO 20871 Determination

Strange but true, in certain cases where a textile material covers the “outermost sole” of a rubber or plastic soled shoe, the duty rate on such imported shoe may be lower than if the sole were without the “fuzz.”

This results because such textile coating can move an importation of footwear from one category, i.e., classification, to another, and with such move can come an accompanying change in the rate of duty (and possibly one that is favorable to the importer – think cheaper).

For anyone not well-versed in tariff-ease, all this really means is that a fuzzy bottom can cost less to import in to the US than one that is bare.

In case it is not obvious, the “outer sole” is that part of footwear (other than an attached heel) which, when in use, is in contact with the ground, i.e., the bottom of the shoe.

Since a more favorable duty rate may, at times, be obtained where footwear has an outer sole of textile, it’s not uncommon to find importers buying footwear that has a thin textile coating on the bottom (which can feel fuzzy) and then classifying the footwear under the tariff number for shoes having textile on its sole in order to take advantage of these duty savings.

Since US Customs is in the business of collecting as much money in duties (revenue) as possible, in an effort to curb inappropriate usage of such classifications, it routinely requests more information on imported shipments to confirm that the textile is actually there.

Starting this month (Nov. 2013), US Customs has decided that the ISO 20871 test method will be recognized in assessing the characteristics of the textile material attached to outer soles.

This means that when an importer is asked to provide more information (Customs Form 28) about a textile covered sole, an analysis performed by an independent lab using this test method (ISO 20871) should be presented.

 Also, keep in mind that US Customs can always conduct its own testing when circumstances warrant it.

To learn more about the impact of this, the newly branded US Fashion Industry Association (formerly USITA) is having a webinar on this.  More information on the event can be found here.

Questions/comments?  Post below or email me at clark.deanna@gmail.com  

Keep up with me!

On Facebook: www.facebook.com/fashioncompliance (*Like* the page to get updates)

On YouTube:  www.youtube.com/FashionCompliance

On Twitter:  @fashcompliance

Do You Make Men’s or Boy’s Suits of Imported Worsted Wool?

Submit Your Application by 5 pm on Oct. 15, 2013

 to Obtain a Tariff Rate Quota!

 

 

A “Tariff Rate Quota” (TRQ) is a temporary reduction on import duties, and in this particular case, it would mean a duty savings of 25%, or $25 on every $100, imported through Dec. 31, 2014.

Title V of the Trade and Development Act of 2000, which created this TRQ, requires that they be allocated to persons who

1) Cut and sew men’s and boy’s worsted wool suits, suit-type jackets and trousers in the United States, and/or

2) Weave worsted wool fabrics with an average fiber diameter of either 18.5 microns or less, OR that which is greater than 18.5 microns, for making men’s and boy’s suits.

Right now, applications to obtain this reduction are being accepted from “persons,” i.e., firms, corporations, or other legal entities, who either fall under either of the two above categories.

In order to be eligible for this TRQ, an application must be submitted on the form provided at http://otexa.ita.doc.gov/wooltrq/wool_app.htm

and be submitted by 5 pm on October 15, 2013 to the

Office of Textiles and Apparel, Room 30003

U.S. Dept. of Commerce

1401 Constitution Ave. NW

Washington, DC  20230

If you have any problems with the link above, you may also call (202) 482-3400.

Questions/comments?  Post below or email me at clark.deanna@gmail.com

Keep up with me:

On Twitter @fashcompliance https://twitter.com/fashcompliance

On Facebook http://on.fb.me/17Pocfj

On YouTube http://bit.ly/12a9lau

 

 

What Is a "Sale?" (US Customs' View of It, That Is...)

Here in NYC we are wrapping up the season of winter sales (which, as an aside, have been pretty fun to shop), but this has nothing to do with what a “sale” is when it comes to importation as this concept does not relate to discounted merchandise.

A “sale” in Federal Court language is the transfer (or “passage”) of title from one party to another for “consideration.”

In everyday language, it means where I obtain something belonging to someone else in exchange for something else.  For example, trading money (i.e., purchasing) for a cashmere sweater from Bloomingdale’s, which is likely to be discounted now given the winter sales season but alas, I digress…

Having a “sale” is relevant for valuation purposes of an imported product.  This is because duties are collected on the value of merchandise which is typically identified in a commercial invoice.  Where a part of the product is supplied by the importer and the value for this is not accounted for, it can lead to an incorrect declaration and hence, an inaccurate calculation on the collection of customs duties which must be paid to US Customs when goods are entered into the US.

A sale must therefore be identifiable.

While US Customs uses no single factor as evidence, acceptable proofs of such exchange include payment by check, bank transfer, or such other commercially acceptable means of payment.  The payment must also be made for the imported merchandise at issue.  Therefore, a general transfer of money from one corporate entity to another – which cannot be linked to a specific import transaction – would not likely demonstrate the passage of title.

Lastly, when deciding whether a sale happened or not, US Customs will look at whether the circumstances of the transaction indicate that the parties are functioning as buyer and seller.  While this is normally not difficult to identify when unrelated parties are doing business (even at the most basic level like what you would find on www.craigslist.org), when the parties are related such a clearly identifiable transaction isn’t always clear, which could lead to inaccurate value declarations as described above.

Questions/comments?  Post below or email me at clark.deanna@gmail.com

Follow me on twitter @fashcompliance

ciao ciao!